Skip to main content

Lesson 03 of 25

The EU Institutions That Make and Police Privacy Law

5 min read · CIPP/E

Untangle the Commission, Parliament, the two Councils, and the CJEU—plus the DPAs, EDPB, and EDPS. Stop losing points to the look-alike institutions and know exactly who proposes, adopts, and interprets EU data protection law.

Two clubs, two courts

  • Council of Europe — 46 states, runs the ECHR and the ECtHR
  • European Union — 27 states, runs the GDPR and the CJEU
  • Different membership, different instruments
  • Domain I tests whether you can tell them apart

Before we name the EU institutions, fix one big distinction in your mind, because Domain one tests it. There are two separate European bodies, and they are easy to confuse. The Council of Europe is a wider human-rights organisation of forty-six member states; it created the European Convention on Human Rights and runs the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg.

The European Union is a smaller political and economic union of twenty-seven member states; it made the GDPR and is served by the Court of Justice of the European Union in Luxembourg. The Council of Europe is not an EU body. Keep those two clubs and their two courts separate, and several exam questions become easy.

The European Commission

  • The EU's executive — proposes legislation
  • Only body that can initiate EU law (right of initiative)
  • Adopts adequacy decisions for international transfers
  • Acts as guardian of the treaties; enforces EU law

Now the EU institutions. Start with the European Commission, the Union's executive arm. The Commission has the right of initiative, which means it is the institution that proposes new EU legislation.

When the exam asks which European institution is vested with the competence to propose data protection law, the answer is the Commission. The Commission also does something you will meet again in Domain three: it adopts adequacy decisions, the formal findings that a non-EU country offers an adequate level of data protection, which then permits data transfers to that country. And as guardian of the treaties, the Commission can take member states to court for failing to apply EU law.

Parliament and the two Councils

  • European Parliament — directly elected; co-legislator
  • Council of the EU — ministers of member states; co-legislator
  • European Council — heads of state; sets direction, does not legislate
  • Ordinary legislative procedure: Commission proposes, Parliament + Council adopt

The Commission proposes, but two bodies decide. The European Parliament is directly elected by EU citizens and acts as a co-legislator. The Council of the European Union is made up of government ministers from each member state, and it is the other co-legislator.

Under the ordinary legislative procedure, the Commission proposes a law and the Parliament and the Council must both agree on it, which is exactly how the GDPR was adopted in twenty sixteen. Be careful with one more name: the European Council, with a capital C and no 'of the EU,' is a different body, the summit of heads of state and government. It sets the EU's broad political direction but does not pass legislation.

So we have three easily confused names: the Council of Europe, the Council of the EU, and the European Council. The exam absolutely tests that trio.

The Court of Justice of the EU

  • Interprets EU law; ensures uniform application across states
  • Preliminary references: national courts ask the CJEU
  • Landmark privacy rulings: Google Spain, Schrems I, Schrems II
  • Its judgments bind all member states

The Court of Justice of the European Union, the CJEU, is the EU's supreme court for matters of EU law. Its job is to make sure EU law is interpreted the same way in every member state. Much of its work comes through preliminary references, where a national court pauses a case and asks the CJEU how to read EU law.

The CJEU has shaped data protection profoundly. It gave us the right to be forgotten in Google Spain, case C-131/12. It struck down the Safe Harbor transfer framework in Schrems I, case C-362/14, and then the Privacy Shield in Schrems II, case C-311/18.

We will study those cases later, but for now know that the CJEU's rulings bind every member state and can invalidate even a Commission decision.

The supervisory authorities and EU-level bodies

  • Each member state has a Data Protection Authority (DPA)
  • European Data Protection Board (EDPB) — coordinates the DPAs
  • European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) — oversees EU institutions
  • Detail comes in Domain IV; meet the names now

Finally, the data-protection-specific institutions, which we will study in depth in Domain four but should meet now. Every EU member state has its own independent supervisory authority, often called a Data Protection Authority, or DPA, such as France's CNIL or Ireland's Data Protection Commission. Sitting above them is the European Data Protection Board, the EDPB, which brings the national authorities together to ensure the GDPR is applied consistently across the Union.

And separately, the European Data Protection Supervisor, the EDPS, is the independent authority that oversees how the EU's own institutions handle personal data. Three letters apart, the EDPB coordinates the member-state regulators, while the EDPS polices the EU's internal bodies.

Recap

  • Commission proposes; Parliament + Council of the EU adopt
  • European Council sets direction; Council of Europe is separate
  • CJEU interprets EU law and shaped privacy through case law
  • Next: the legislative framework from Directive 95/46 to the GDPR

Let's lock it in. The Commission proposes EU law and adopts adequacy decisions. The Parliament and the Council of the EU adopt it together.

The European Council sets political direction but does not legislate, and the Council of Europe is an entirely separate human-rights body. The CJEU interprets EU law and, through cases like Google Spain and the two Schrems judgments, has reshaped privacy. And the EDPB and EDPS are the data-protection regulators we will return to in Domain four.

Next, we trace the actual statutes, from the old Directive 95/46 to the GDPR that replaced it. Go test yourself on the institutions first.

Sources

  • Treaty on European Union and TFEU
  • Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU
  • European Convention on Human Rights
  • case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)
  • Council of Europe statute

Test your knowledge

A few CIPP/E questions on this material — pick an answer to see the explanation.

  1. Q1. A newspaper receives an erasure request asking it to delete an accurate published article about an ongoing criminal trial of a public figure. How should the right to erasure be applied?

  2. Q2. The 2014 CJEU decision in Google Spain (C-131/12) is best known for establishing which principle?

  3. Q3. Which condition must be met for the right to data portability to apply?

  4. Q4. Following a personal data breach likely to result in a risk to individuals, what is the controller's primary notification obligation under the GDPR?

Ready to practice?

Put this lesson to work on real CIPP/E questions.

Drill the full CIPP/E bank →